What a load of humbug from the envious. I have never worked in the public sector but my private sector employers have been taking "pension holidays" for years in the good times. This despite their contribution being a part of my contract and agreed remuneration. They just went ahead and broke the contract with me. Then, they told me times were hard, the markets expected better returns, so the final salary pensions had to go. Finally, half my pension was lost because it was invested in high risk stocks & shares, rather than the government bonds pensions used to be invested in.
Meanwhile, the pensions "industry" has been "debating the changes".
I have no problem with public sector employees getting exactly what they contracted for when they took their jobs, and if that included a decent pension, then good luck to them. If they remained organised and had their unions fight any changes that would strip them of what they had bargained for, good for them.
As for us poor private sector employees and rate payers, we agreed these contracts including the pension rights, so we must pay them. It not "our" money. We owe these people a decent retirement because that's what we agreed to give them for their labour.
The real debate is what should be done about our dreadful private pensions industry, that happily debates changes to private pensions for a decade, thinks its smart to invest our contributions into highly volatile investments, and continue to be paid hansom fees for their bother. When the balloon goes up, there they are sagely stroking their luxuriant beards telling us we should not expect a pension at all. What this country will do when literally thousands of good people, who have worked hard all their lives, end up begging on the streets in the last days of their lives, I don't know.
I just hope we have enough strength to string up the pension "industry players", who mis-sold and mal-administered their roles; and sent thousands to long term poverty.
Paul