Share this page:
Stay connected:
Welcome to the Citywire Money Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Public Sector Pensions
Jon Gallagher
Posted: 02 August 2010 01:12:32(UTC)
#1

Joined: 01/08/2010(UTC)
Posts: 91

How long realistically can the public sector continue to pay out final salary pension schemes and continue with the rule of 85 if it still exists. Working in the private sector, final salary schemes are now non existent and i think the public sector should follow suit. We hear about how low paid public sector workers are as are their pensions, however they (usually trade unions) always cite cleaners and catering staff. Most public sector employees are in well paid jobs, i.e. all those at the HQ function,unit managers, supervisors and those in admin, professional and technical jobs - costs a fortune to maintain in pensions when they retire. Those who come out with small pensions of £3 or £4 or £5k a year end up giving 20% tax at source and then are penalised by the council they worked for anyway and end up paying most of it back in council tax as they dont get any benefit. M owny parents are left with approx 35% of their private pension - 20% tax at source and 45% to the council. Council % share goes up year after year - they will soon be left with hardly anything at all.
Adrian Arnold-Smith
Posted: 03 August 2010 10:35:37(UTC)
#2

Joined: 03/10/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1

More should be done to defend and support decent pensions for all (not just the failed CEOs) in the private sector rather than to wreck those in the public sector.
Mikel Nicholls
Posted: 03 August 2010 10:53:16(UTC)
#3

Joined: 31/10/2007(UTC)
Posts: 3

Many years ago, when I was paying 15% on my overdraft, I was having my lunch listening to the news. A "pundit" said that no one who was working would ever receive a pension. Three years later many employers had a contribution holiday. My point is that if you project a trend forward over more than 4 to 5 years the outcome will be unreliable. At the present time the population predictions are more accurate than most and a squeeze is inevitable, but how severe it is likely to be is not wholly predictable.
phildoc
Posted: 03 August 2010 11:00:19(UTC)
#4

Joined: 21/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 4

i am sick of this whingeing about public sector pensions. It is just about the only reason most of us would want to work in the public sector. No mention of this in the boom years when middle and senior manegement level salaries outstrip those in the public sector not to mention perks like cars and travel that public sector workers have never had. Any attempt to remove or curtail pensions for medical staff in the NHs will result in mass resignation. Believe me it will happen.
Woodberry
Posted: 03 August 2010 11:29:33(UTC)
#5

Joined: 25/01/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2

It is sad that instead of asking the obvious question - "How do we make sure everyone has a decent pension when they retire?" - the debate here and almost everywhere else is in terms of - "This group of people have built up good pensions so lets drag them down to the level of those hwo haven't". The unconstructive politics of envy.
Rogerq
Posted: 03 August 2010 12:15:40(UTC)
#6

Joined: 16/11/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1

It is clearly time that pensionable age has to be raised for everyone to a more realistic level, and my view is that it should be up to 70 for men and women and reached in stages over the next 20 years.
I cannot understand why there is so much disparity in pensions, whether it be public sector, private sector large employers or private sector smaller employers.
The retirement age should be the same for everyone, and every employer, large small or public, should pay into a personal plan for their employees on the same minimum percentage scale, and so should the employee to a similar scale, levels of all determined as minimums by legislation. Then, above this level, if employees wish to raise their payment, then employers do also to a similar scale. These resultant individual funds should then be available to the employee at a time of his/her choosing with which to buy a pension and retire.
The country cannot afford to go on as we are. I read that 25% of your council tax goes on council employees pensions. This is probably more than each individual pays into his own pension fund, and that does not include all other public employees.
I cannot understand why anyone, whether public or private employees believes they have a right to an unfunded pension, paid for by someone else..
Anonymous Post
Posted: 03 August 2010 12:45:17(UTC)
#7
Anonymous 1 needed this 'Off the Record'

I'm tired of all this public sector bashing. One has to remember that the average sector employee in the NHS is a nurse earning around 22k after 4 yrs training ; working on a full ward, constantly stressed due to from staff shortages and with huge life - saving responsibilities. It sickens me to think that an individual like this has to be penalised and give up their establshed final salary scheme as a penalty for the gross incompetence of the banks ( who , by the way are still giving out big bonuses }
Malcolm Martins
Posted: 03 August 2010 12:59:05(UTC)
#8

Joined: 16/02/2010(UTC)
Posts: 4

The cost to the employer of local government pension is 18% of the employees wage. The employee pays 6%.The cost is likely to rise again next year. This is not as much as has been quoted above, but it still has an impact on the rates. I do not believe a change in the public sector pension schemes would result in mass resignations.Where would they go to? The private sector average pay is no better, and no possibility of a a final salary pension.
Bob
Posted: 03 August 2010 13:38:13(UTC)
#9

Joined: 11/10/2008(UTC)
Posts: 6

I agree with Malcolm Martins. It is simply risible to suggest that there would be mass resignations from the public services if changes were made to pension schemes (to reflect the experience of those outside the public services who are responsible in large part for financing the payment of public service pensions). If ever there were such resignations, the resultant vacancies would be filled very rapidly indeed. Let's not cloud any debate by making foolish "threats" which will not be made good. What will, in fact, happen if unwelcome changes are made to public service pension schemes is that there will be strikes from what is just about the last heavily unionised workforces left in Britain whilst the people involved cling on desperately to the jobs that they tell us are both unpleasant and underpaid.
phildoc
Posted: 03 August 2010 14:06:29(UTC)
#10

Joined: 21/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 4

They would set up in chambers and contract to the NHS or whatever was left of it. If you think this can't happen ask yourself why there probably isn't an NHS dentist near you. I can easily earn more in the private sector as can most of my colleagues and the pension is what keeps me loyal to the NHs very little else.
Andrew - London
Posted: 03 August 2010 14:14:14(UTC)
#11

Joined: 18/05/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2

The public sector pensions should not be punished because of the poor management of the private sector funds - which has resulted in most of the private final salary schemes closing. Of course the Public Sector pensions should be "funded" not "unfunded" but they aren't which is the governments doing. I think people forget the perks of the private sector - bonuses, car allowance, salary rises without government interference, etc. I for one will be encouraging my wife (NHS Medico) to go on strike if there is any move on pension change.
James A Kane
Posted: 03 August 2010 14:14:33(UTC)
#12

Joined: 03/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 8

Those of us who work in the pensions industry have known for a long time (Pensions Act 1995) that final salary pensions schemes were unsustainable. Proof of this is that most private industry has already closed such schemes. The future for the public sector is the same. Public sector schemes will progressively go through major changes. Only MP's will survive (and perhaps senior civil servants) as they are the lawmakers. A discussion like this would have been unthinkable a few years ago, even though we in the pensions business have been talking about it for a decade.
barry slater
Posted: 03 August 2010 14:23:46(UTC)
#13

Joined: 24/03/2010(UTC)
Posts: 7

Public sector pensions must be stopped and the sooner the better.
lets have a level playing field with private ands public sector pensions.

You want a better pension..so put more money into one. ..as long as its your money not mine !
Objective
Posted: 03 August 2010 15:09:58(UTC)
#14

Joined: 03/08/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1

What a load of humbug from the envious. I have never worked in the public sector but my private sector employers have been taking "pension holidays" for years in the good times. This despite their contribution being a part of my contract and agreed remuneration. They just went ahead and broke the contract with me. Then, they told me times were hard, the markets expected better returns, so the final salary pensions had to go. Finally, half my pension was lost because it was invested in high risk stocks & shares, rather than the government bonds pensions used to be invested in.

Meanwhile, the pensions "industry" has been "debating the changes".

I have no problem with public sector employees getting exactly what they contracted for when they took their jobs, and if that included a decent pension, then good luck to them. If they remained organised and had their unions fight any changes that would strip them of what they had bargained for, good for them.

As for us poor private sector employees and rate payers, we agreed these contracts including the pension rights, so we must pay them. It not "our" money. We owe these people a decent retirement because that's what we agreed to give them for their labour.

The real debate is what should be done about our dreadful private pensions industry, that happily debates changes to private pensions for a decade, thinks its smart to invest our contributions into highly volatile investments, and continue to be paid hansom fees for their bother. When the balloon goes up, there they are sagely stroking their luxuriant beards telling us we should not expect a pension at all. What this country will do when literally thousands of good people, who have worked hard all their lives, end up begging on the streets in the last days of their lives, I don't know.

I just hope we have enough strength to string up the pension "industry players", who mis-sold and mal-administered their roles; and sent thousands to long term poverty.

Paul
Andrew - London
Posted: 03 August 2010 16:07:35(UTC)
#15

Joined: 18/05/2006(UTC)
Posts: 2

To James A Kane,
how can you say that the industry has known for a long time that final salary schemes are unstainable. That's rubbish. It just takes good planning, investment management and actual expertise and they can be sustained in the same way as non-final salary schemes. Employees and employers contribute roughly the same amounts in each type of scheme (in the private sector at least).
Private schemes have been closed because of bad management being covered up by saying they are too costly. What a cop-out! Wake up and smell the coffee....
MrPedanticke
Posted: 03 August 2010 16:11:44(UTC)
#16

Joined: 03/08/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1

It is particularly annoying that so many articles and comments start in the fashion "...can industry/public sector/taxpayer afford to find the money to continue to pay pensions?"

This nonsense needs to stop. Long before Brown and Darling were bleating about how workers should save for their retirement we were doing just that; 15% of our income for 40+ years put into the safekeeping of our pension fund trustees, overseen and protected by our politicians and various "independant" quangos over the years. If the money has been squandered or raided and stolen then where has it gone and why is no-one in gaol? Whatever, it's not the pensioners that are the bad guys, so lay off!
Jon Gallagher
Posted: 03 August 2010 17:25:48(UTC)
#17

Joined: 01/08/2010(UTC)
Posts: 91

Mr Pedanticke,
Like yourself my parents,(only my father worked) managed to put aside a generous proportion of his salary to a pension scheme and my mother stayed home and brought up four children. We were never short of cash, we had family car and one holiday a year even though my father worked as a baker. I am now in the same situation as my father with 4 small childrenbut have a professional career - one difference however a mortgage of £1200 per month for a 3 bedroom apartment. A far greater proprtion of icome has to go on the mortgage or rent today, if not, I would also put in 15% of my income into a private fund. Andrew of London mentions, bonuses, car allowances and salary increases in the private sector. In the city where i live a public sector figure - head of a service, just recieved a bonus of circa £80k in consultation with the council, car allowances are commonplace in every council and they are even paid when the employee is off sick for months and months and most emloyees are on incremental progression for up to 5 years plus inflationary increases every year at the same time. And yes, i worked in local authorities for 15 years and my pay went up by £750 - £1000 every year over the 5 year period on an average salary at the time. I was not in the pension by the way due to the cost of housing. Public sector workers are not as hard pressed as u think, just look at the salaries in your local paper.
Douglas
Posted: 03 August 2010 17:39:22(UTC)
#18

Joined: 09/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 4

I doubt if it will noticed.
Douglas
Posted: 03 August 2010 17:48:11(UTC)
#19

Joined: 09/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 4

I have community nurses on £45+living by me, that come and go as they please. Trainee nurses in hospitals are on a low wage scale, no different to any person in training. Fully trained nurses spend more time scribbling on clip boards, the main work being done by auxiliary nurses. Years ago, nurses, like many other workers were poorly paid, not anymore, but still the public hold them on a pedestal.
P Williams
Posted: 03 August 2010 21:10:54(UTC)
#20

Joined: 16/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 2

PhilDoc Needs to wake up - mass resignations good. Then the BMA Trade Union will be broken up. Its the greedy Consultants who use the NHS to pay for their medical support staff but who float in and out of their private work at our expense that will bring on the demise of the NHS and their fancy salaries - circa £250k per ann - plus final salary pensions. As usual its the higher echelones that will ruin it for the rest.
2 Pages12Next page
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets