Share this page:
Stay connected:
Welcome to the Citywire Money Forums, where members share investment ideas and discuss everything to do with their money.

You'll need to log in or set up an account to start new discussions or reply to existing ones. See you inside!

Notification

Icon
Error

Will we ever wean Britain off booze?
Anonymous Post
Posted: 02 September 2010 11:45:03(UTC)
#21
Anonymous 4 needed this 'Off the Record'

I have had the misfortune to arrive at A&E with Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat that wont stop on its own) a number of times in the last 10 years. In the early days I would announce to the staff that it was drink related as it usually came on after a bender. I now realise it was probably just as much the coffee I was drinking in between times as the alcohol, but on each occassion I have never been asked by a doctor or nurse whether I needed help with my drinking habits, never once. It took me 10 years of personal hard work to wean myself off it but just asking me if everthing was OK could have saved time, money and (excuse the pun) heartache.
S M
Posted: 02 September 2010 13:00:59(UTC)
#22

Joined: 05/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5

Thanks: 2 times
All folk should be accountable for their actions and that includes booze. All the 'do gooders' in the world will not wean the booze brigade off their drinks
The only successful way is to hit them hard in the pocket, the ultimate accountability for their actions

Dont foist the costs off onto the innocent.

All the other suggestions have proven to be an expensive waste of time but that does not deter the usual suspects from trotting them out
Ian Phillips
Posted: 02 September 2010 14:26:10(UTC)
#23

Joined: 10/06/2010(UTC)
Posts: 34

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Is the control of the choice to do something that is legal by specific taxation the action of a "free" society??
George Hill
Posted: 02 September 2010 16:37:49(UTC)
#24

Joined: 10/08/2010(UTC)
Posts: 29

There is no such thing as a "free" society - and could never be. We HAVE no rights only certain privileges under the law. BUT - attempting to protect the vulnerable (in this case the untutored young) from their own stupidity/naivety/inexperience is something else. LAWS are needed to do this - and protect them from an uncaring world of profiteering. The MAIN fault lay with the booze firms - and their being allowed to do it (i.e. alcopops) by the government of the time. Not that it would make ANY difference WHATEVER the colour of the party in power.
S M
Posted: 02 September 2010 17:05:15(UTC)
#25

Joined: 05/06/2007(UTC)
Posts: 5

Thanks: 2 times
So all these people are forced to buy the stuff?
By the way, where are their parents?
Wrong solution
A Murray
Posted: 08 September 2010 10:49:51(UTC)
#26

Joined: 16/09/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2

I agree with Anthony Tinslay first strike, second strike etc.
However, there is great precedent from Military Law, with offences such as 'drunk and disorderly' resulting in a night in the cells and a week of physical duty under restrictions. It just needs political will and preventing those who promote 'rights' over 'responsibilities' from hindering the exercise of common sense.
Increasing prices penalises the many for the offences of the few, and does not address the problem. Those that want to get blind drunk will steal or rob with violence what they need knowing they will only get a slap on the wrist. Proper penalties that hurt pocket and freedoms are the only way.
NHS should not be a staging post for habitual drunks. The young on their first outing, or the unwary who have been slipped a mickey should be treated properly - but repetition should be passed on to more severe regimes of treatment, perhaps at a separate clinic to which all drunks are moved to under escort, funded by penalties rather than the taxpayer.
2 PagesPrevious page12
+ Reply to discussion

Markets

Other markets